search
The National Academies | National Academy of Sciences | National Academy of Engineering | Institute of Medicine | National Research Council
Home About NAKFI Conferences Grants Communication Awards Contact Us My Account

Synthetic Biology Home
Steering Committee Members
IDR Team Challenge Summaries
Podcast Tutorials
Conference Agenda
Grants
Conference Photos

Login to manage your account and access the Futures Network.
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Password Reminder



FIRST NAME
LAST NAME
EMAIL



Synthetic Biology Interdisciplinary Challenge 7
How do we move beyond genetics to engage chemical and physical approaches to synthetic biology?

Challenge Summary
The controlled manipulation of genetic information constitutes the “standard model” of synthetic biology.  But biological behavior is subject to control at many levels, and biological systems respond to a wide range of chemical and physical stimuli.  As cells and organisms adapt to their environments, they change the genes they express, the chemical substrates they use and the metabolites they produce.  They respond to changes in temperature, pH, and ionic strength, to light and mechanical forces, and to many other chemical and physical signals.  Researchers interested in creating new biological function can therefore draw on a set of tools that extends well beyond genetic manipulation.

Recent advances in chemistry, physics, and engineering have provided powerful new routes to novel biological behavior.  Chemists have demonstrated the capacity of cells and organisms to use non-standard substrates, including amino acids, fatty acids and sugars that don’t occur naturally.  Non-standard nucleotides can be processed with high fidelity by DNA polymerase, non-canonical amino acids are readily incorporated into natural and artificial proteins, and novel sugars and fatty acids have been used to probe post-translational modification on a proteome-wide scale.  Engineering of proteins and pathways has extended the diversity of substrates and products still further.

Physical tools such as patterning of cells on surfaces, microfabrication of three-dimensional cellular structures, and microfluidic delivery of proteins and other soluble factors also create significant opportunities for control of biological function.  Such tools will become increasingly important as synthetic biology embraces more fully the design of complex multicellular systems.

Key Questions

  • What are the most promising approaches to chemical and physical control of biological function?  Inhibition or re-wiring of cellular pathways? Introduction of light-sensitive or mechanically-sensitive components?  Others?
  • Which cellular pathways are most promising with respect to control by chemical and physical means? 
  • What advantages might accrue from the development of novel chemical substrates (e.g., “abiological” nucleotides, amino acids, sugars, and other biosynthetic intermediates) for use in synthetic biology?
  • Can we create organisms that prefer or even require altered sets of molecular substrates?  If so, what kinds of biological behavior might emerge from such adaptations?
  • To what extent can we change the properties of biological macromolecules? Will such changes allow us to overcome some of the most important limitations of macromolecular therapeutics or industrial enzymes, e.g., sensitivity to proteases, surfactants, or dehydration?
  • How can control of spatial relationships among cells contribute to the engineering of novel biological function? 
  • Are there advances in bioreactor design and micro- and nano-fluidic technologies that should be brought to bear on problems in synthetic biology?
Reading
Ismagilov RF and Maharbiz MM. Can we build synthetic, multicellular systems by controlling developmental signaling in space and time? Curr Opin Chem Biol 2007;11:604: Accessed online 28 July 2009.

Justman QA, Serber Z, Ferrel Jr. JE, El-Samad H, Shokat KM. Tuning the activation threshold of a kinase network by nested feedback loops. Science 2009;324:509:http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/324/5926/509.  Accessed online 28 July 2009.

Krueger AT and Kool ET. Redesigning the architecture of the base pair: Toward biochemical and biological function of new genetic sets. Chemistry & Biology 2009;16:242: Accessed online 3 August 2009.

Zhou H, Xie XK, and Tang Y. Engineering natural products using combinatorial biosynthesis and biocatalysis. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008;19:590.  Accessed online 28 July 2009.


 

Copyright © 2009-2010. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. | Terms of Use |